I Have a Gripe

May 15, 2010

Specter, Kagan and “Present”

This past week, President Obama announced his pick for the Supreme Court. Elena Kagan would replace soon-to-retire Justice John Paul Stevens. Kagan enjoyed bipartisan support when she was nominated for Solictor General about one year ago. That is, except for Senator Arlen Specter.

Let’s be upfront. I don’t like Senator Specter. He changes his opinions, along with his party affiliation, to cover his backside and keep himself in office. Personally, I hope he gets voted out in the upcoming election.

In typical Specter fashion, when Kagan went before the Senate for her final vote, he voted “present.”

Now I did lots of research online and was unable to find any specific information on how the present vote exactly works and when its use began. If anyone can provide specific information, I would be very appreciative.

Not that a Solicitor General vote is a “simple vote,” but this wasn’t a vote to go to war or extend unemployment benefits. This was a vote to approve one individual to a government position. Even this he couldn’t take a stand. Some say present is a “soft no,” but honestly, I’m not really sure.

So, I respectfully request Senator Specter actually make a decision and vote “aye” or “nay” on this vote and not take the spineless way out and vote “present.”

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: